RSS Feed

999,996 Trees

In 2006, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa launched  an aggressive program to plant 1 million trees.  What a GREAT idea!  Let’s plant more trees.  Everyone is in favor of trees.  Homeowners like trees.  City officials like trees.  Even meter maids like trees, we’re told.  Fast forward five years and we’ve learned the City lost a few of its cherished trees.

After work today, one homeowner uprooted four trees and the majority of their side garden to be able to accommodate one more car in their driveway.  No more lemons, no more limes, and no more peaches.  No more trees.

Sure, the bougainvillea remains, though drastically reduced (like our parking!), but it is still just as prickly as the oppressive enforcement undertaken over the past few weeks by Jaime de la Vega’s LADOT.  Remember, de la Vega pledged to “restore public confidence that the department is well run.”  Two months into his new job, it’s safe to say that a certain segment of residents could safely argue that he’s got a lot of work to do.

But let’s get back to the premise of this posting, shall we?

How many more trees do we need to fell before the City comes to its senses?

How many more gardens do we need to pave before the City comes to its senses?

The City’s parking enforcement efforts are, indeed, senseless.

Advertisements

5 responses »

  1. i have been parking here for over 32 years, why are they doing this to me?

    Reply
  2. These parking gestapo are making life unlivable here. I live here, worked hard to afford property here, and they take and take. Taxes aren’t enough for these people, they need more and more. They also keep changing the rules to maximize their fiscal benefit while minimizing the positive effects on the neighborhood and businesses. Ridiculous. It’s like David vs. Goliath. I want my streets back.

    Reply
    • That’s right Alex. So far, our slingshot is no match for the City’s club.

      Reply
      • I used to be one of the beneficiaries of the amazing fruit grown on these former trees. Sad, like Samantha says.

        From a public policy perspective, the City seems to be intent on going after an issue that nobody really has an issue with, and really constitutes at the end of the day an attack on a small segment of homeowners for no apparent reason.

  3. This is sad. You’re right, this is senseless. What happens when summer break is over? Then what?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: